RemNote Community
Community

Foundations of Peace and Conflict Studies

Understand the scope and interdisciplinary nature of peace and conflict studies, how it differs from strategic/war studies, and its historical evolution since World II.
Summary
Read Summary
Flashcards
Save Flashcards
Quiz
Take Quiz

Quick Practice

How does peace and conflict studies differ from strategic and war studies in terms of its level of analysis?
1 of 5

Summary

Understanding Peace and Conflict Studies What Is Peace and Conflict Studies? Peace and conflict studies is a social science field dedicated to understanding both violent and nonviolent behaviors in human societies. Rather than simply studying warfare or conflict in isolation, this discipline takes a broader approach: it examines the structural mechanisms that underlie conflicts, analyzes why they occur, and explores how societies can move toward more desirable human conditions. Think of it this way—while military strategists might ask "how do we win a war?", peace and conflict scholars ask "why does this conflict exist in the first place, and what systemic changes could prevent it?" The Connection to Peace Studies Peace studies is closely related but represents a more focused effort. Peace studies is an interdisciplinary field specifically aimed at preventing, de-escalating, and solving conflicts through peaceful means. Where peace and conflict studies is broader and more analytical, peace studies is more prescriptive—it actively seeks conflict resolution and dispute resolution through what are called "positive-sum solutions" (outcomes where all parties benefit, rather than one side winning at another's expense). You can think of peace studies as applying the insights from peace and conflict studies to find practical solutions at both international and domestic levels. How Is This Different from Strategic and War Studies? This is an important distinction. Strategic studies and war studies typically operate from a realist perspective, focusing on state or individual unit-level interests and how to achieve military objectives. They ask: "How do we protect our nation's interests through military strategy?" By contrast, peace and conflict studies emphasizes: Structural violence—not just direct physical violence, but the systems and inequalities that cause suffering (poverty, discrimination, lack of access to resources) Multiple levels of analysis—examining conflicts not just at the state level, but at social and human levels too Root causes—understanding why conflicts emerge in the first place, rather than only how to win them An Interdisciplinary Field Peace and conflict studies draws from many academic disciplines, including: Philosophy, geography, economics, psychology, communication studies, sociology, international relations, history, anthropology, religious studies, gender studies, law, and development studies. This interdisciplinary approach is essential because conflicts are complex phenomena—they have economic dimensions, psychological dimensions, historical dimensions, and more. No single discipline can fully explain them. <extrainfo> The academic study of peace is also known as irenology (from the Greek irene, meaning peace). You may occasionally encounter this term in scholarly literature, though "peace studies" is far more commonly used. </extrainfo> Historical Development: How the Field Emerged <extrainfo> Post-World War II Origins The modern discipline of peace and conflict studies emerged after World War II, stimulated by the founding of the United Nations system. The devastation of the war created urgency around understanding and preventing future global conflicts. Growth in the 1960s and 1970s The field expanded significantly during this period, with influential scholars such as Johan Galtung and John Burton conducting research that shaped how we understand conflict today. This was a time of significant social upheaval—civil rights movements, anti-war protests, and debates about social justice—which naturally drew academic attention to questions about peaceful change and structural inequality. Evolution After the Cold War As the Cold War ended in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the field shifted its focus. Rather than concentrating primarily on international military conflict, peace and conflict studies began examining complex issues like human security, democratization, human rights, social justice, welfare, development, and the concept of "sustainable peace"—peace that lasts because it addresses underlying causes of conflict rather than simply suppressing violence. </extrainfo>
Flashcards
How does peace and conflict studies differ from strategic and war studies in terms of its level of analysis?
It emphasises structural violence, social levels, and human levels of analysis rather than realist objectives at the state or individual level.
What event after World War II stimulated more rigorous research in peace and conflict studies?
The founding of the United Nations system.
Which two academics contributed influential research to the field in the 1960s?
Johan Galtung John Burton
What is the primary aim of the interdisciplinary effort known as peace studies?
Preventing, de‑escalating, and solving conflicts by peaceful means.
What type of solutions does peace studies focus on to achieve conflict and dispute resolution?
Positive‑sum solutions.

Quiz

Which post‑World War II development most directly stimulated the growth of peace and conflict studies?
1 of 3
Key Concepts
Peace Studies Foundations
Peace and conflict studies
Irenology
Johan Galtung
John Burton
United Nations
Conflict Dynamics and Resolution
Structural violence
Conflict resolution
Human security
Sustainable peace
Related Fields
Strategic studies